31st
I had the unfortunate occasion to read this half-assed critique of PZ Myers and, rather than have my rant confined only to the domain of Google Reader, I thought I’d post it here as well.
The Dalai Lama’s cumbaya rhetoric is all well and good, but I always find it rather hollow given that, if he and his order still in power, they’d likely still be living like royalty at the expense of the Tibetan people’s utter destitution.
Not that life under the PRC is a picnic (I’m sure it isn’t), but Tibetan theocratic feudalism was brutally oppressing Tibet’s people as recently as 50 years ago. No amount of praise from Richard Gere can rewrite that bloody history, and I wish people would stop looking to this man in a funny dress as some sort of beacon of holiness, allowing leftover orientalist impulses to elevate him above his discredited western counterparts.
The rest of the article seems but a milieu of intellectual masturbation and strawmen. Needless to say, I doubt that even PZ would paint all clerics as necessarily bad or ill-intentioned people, but charlatans they most certainly are, if only unwittingly. As for scripture: I’m sure that the holy books of many religions contain miniscule morsels of worthwhile universal truth, just as I am sure such nuggets exist in the Twilight series of novels. That doesn’t mean that I think that either are worth the trees it takes to print them.